27
af chime, it seemed to me macmalous and illegionl that we should
continue to maintain the ¿zam zabarge.
favour of ita osneellation.
1100
1raoro in
12
lir. Magliarray said that he had consulted his Govern-
meurt zid, momewhat to his surprise had received almost es$-
egoriaal instruation to vote for cancellation as moon 60
possible. At the same time it had occurred to him personally
that it would be very desirable, in comoosion with the Sup-
plementary Naval Agreement to which some of us were parties,
that we should try and eliminate future il-will arising out
of any competition in regard to the supply of naval azarmont,
**0. He understood that so far an eonnimation of thÅ DE
was concerned this danger was already eliminated by the pro-
visions of Article 1 of to tanking yal getonent, wh
by the signatories undertook to keep one another informed of
any orders plused by foreign governments. But we regards
Fuval ignions, sévisora eto.. the position wes not the same,
eb
hara no on pagined that he waspeaking poroonnlly
tithout and ero 1 mind that tight be noira.blo
thet the latory governments should andortnks to keep one
naother into the tines BETAgront with
thon for the der zatoh of mval Minion, in, otool such
no titlontion only to take plans when any agreement with tie
Chinese was wotunlly andom not auring thn nown totono.
The Fronoh Charge aviron taking an K. Knollarray's
1ost point, onutzed what the penition would be mupyoeing
Y
aware planed hy the Quinose it ainate Zino. orders
To which
Hr. HeeMurray replied that he believed that point was already
covered by Article 16 of the washington inval Agreement.
Regarding the main proposal - the termination of the
Arms Embargo
not optimisticslly inclined.
- the Japanese Chargé d'Affaires said he was
It won that Japan, ty
her recent exchange of notes, had virtually recognised the
Hanking/
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.